UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

(AMENDMENT NO.     )

Filed by the Registrant    x☒                         Filed by a Party other than the Registrant    ¨☐

Check the appropriate box:

CONCHO RESOURCES INC.

One Concho Center

600 West Illinois Avenue

Midland, Texas 79701

NOTICE OF 20142017 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

April 5, 2017

Concho Resources Inc.

One Concho Center

600 West Illinois Avenue

Midland, Texas 79701

To the Stockholders of Concho Resources Inc.:

Notice is hereby given that the 2014The 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Concho Resources Inc. (the “Company”) will be held at the Petroleum Club of Midland, 501 West Wall Avenue, Midland, Texas 79701, on Thursday, June 5, 2014,Wednesday, May 17, 2017, at 10:00 a.m. Central Time. The Annual Meeting is being held for the following purposes:Time to:

These proposalsIf you were a stockholder as of the close of business on March 20, 2017, you are described in the accompanying proxy materials. You will be ableentitled to vote at the Annual Meeting only if you wereand at any adjournment thereof.

Instead of mailing a printed copy of the proxy materials, including the Company’s 2016 Annual Report, to each stockholder of record, at the closeCompany is providing access to these materials via the Internet. This reduces the amount of businesspaper necessary to produce these materials, as well as the costs associated with mailing these materials to all stockholders. Accordingly, on or about April 5, 2017, the Company mailed the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) to all stockholders of record as of March 20, 2017 and posted its proxy materials on the Web site referenced in the Notice. As more fully described in the Notice, all stockholders may choose to access the proxy materials on the Web site referred to in the Notice or may request a printed set of the proxy materials. The Notice and Web site provide information regarding how you may request to receive proxy materials in printed form by mail or electronically by email on an ongoing basis.

If you previously elected to receive a printed copy of the materials, the Company has enclosed a copy of its 2016 Annual Report to Stockholders with this notice and proxy statement.

7Your vote is important. Please vote your proxy promptly so your shares can be represented, even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting. You can vote by Internet or by telephone by using the voting procedures described in the Notice, or by requesting a printed copy of the proxy materials (including the proxy card), 2014,and completing, signing and returning the record date for the meeting.enclosed proxy card by mail.

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON MAY 17, 2017. The Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders, Proxy Statement and 2016 Annual Report are available on the Internet at http://www.astproxyportal.com/ast/15517.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

Travis L. Counts

Vice President and General Counsel

Midland, Texas

April 5, 2017

---

2017 PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

Performance

Crude oil prices were volatile in 2016, dipping to a twelve-year low at the start of the year. Amid the volatility, fiscal year 2016 was an exceptional year for the Company, and its operational and financial results highlight the strength of the Company’s business and relentless focus on enhancing capital efficiencies. During 2016, the Company continued to increase value for stockholders by driving down cash costs while simultaneously exceeding its production growth expectations due to drilling efficiencies, completion optimization and strategic acquisitions. The Company also demonstrated exceptional capital discipline and prudent liability management. Since the second half of 2015, cash flow from operating activities exceeded the Company’s core capital expenditure program. This capital discipline and the monetization ofnon-core assets enabled the Company to retire a series of bonds, which reduced absolute debt by $600 million year-over-year. In addition, the Company refinanced a series of bonds at a rate of 2.125% lower than the bonds the Company called, which together with the $600 million debt retirement, combined to eliminate over $50 million of annual interest expense and structurally improved the Company’s cash margin.

Performance Metrics Link to Growth Strategy

The Company’s 2016 short-term and long-term incentive compensation metrics are aligned with the key elements of its strategy to grow stockholder value.

Delivering on Near-Term Objectives, Focusing on Long-Term Value Creation:

Short-Term Incentive Metrics				Long-Term Incentive Metrics
•    Production growth •    Core capital expenditures •    Direct lease operating expense •    Cash general and administrative expense •    Absolute stock performance				•    Time-based long-term awards •    Performance-based long-term awards linked to three-year stock performance versus the Company’s peers as well as the Company’s own absolute annualized stock performance

Governance Highlights

Corporate governance is an important responsibility at the Company, and the Company’s governance policies and structure provide a strong framework for operating more effectively and mitigating risk. They help provide assurance that the Company is ethical and transparent across all of its business endeavors.

Board Independence		•    Seven out of nine directors are independent •    The Chairman, CEO and President is the only management director
Board Composition		•    The Board regularly assesses its performance through Board and committee self-evaluations •    The Board considers the diversity of, and optimal enhancement of, the current mix of talent and experience with respect to its members
Board Committees		•    The Board has four committees – Audit, Compensation, Nominating & Governance and Reserves •    The Audit, Compensation and Nominating & Governance committees are composed entirely of independent directors
Leadership Structure & Open Communication		•    The Lead Director works closely with the Chairman, CEO and President to provide leadership and guidance to the Board •    Among other responsibilities, the Lead Director chairs executive sessions of thenon-management directors and, in consultation with the Chairman, establishes the agenda for each Board meeting •    The Company encourages open communication among the directors, and the directors have access to management
Risk Oversight		•    The entire Board is responsible for risk oversight and each Board committee assists the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities
Director Stock Ownership		•    The directors are required to own shares of the Company’s common stock having a market value of at least $400,000

2017 PROXY STATEMENT		1

---

Voting Matters

Your vote is important. Please vote your proxy promptly so your shares can be represented, even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting. You can vote by Internet or by telephone by using the voting procedures described in the Notice, or by requesting a printed copy of the proxy materials (including the proxy card) and completing, signing and returning the enclosed proxy card by mail.

Proposal		Board Vote Recommendation					Page Reference for More     Detail
1. Election of three Class I directors		FOR EACH NOMINEE					5
2. Ratification of Grant Thornton LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for 2017		FOR					20
3. Approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers		FOR					23
4. Approve, on an advisory basis, the frequency of the advisory vote to approve the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers		ONE YEAR					24

Director Nominees

The Board of Directors has nominated three candidates to serve a three-year term expiring in 2020. The following provides brief summary information about each director nominee. The Board has determined that both Messrs. Easter and Surma are independent.

		TIMOTHY A. LEACH Director since 2006 Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and President				WILLIAM H. EASTER III Director since 2008 Audit Committee Compensation Committee Nominating & Governance Committee				JOHN P. SURMA Director since 2014 Audit Committee Compensation Committee
Each of the director nominees attended more than 75% of the meetings of the Board and the committees on which such director served during 2016.

Travis L. Counts
Vice President and General Counsel   2017 PROXY STATEMENT		2

Midland, Texas

April 22, 2014

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to Be Held on June 5, 2014:

This Notice and Proxy Statement, along with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 and the Company’s 2013 Annual Report to Stockholders, are available free of charge atwww.concho.com/proxy.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

i

2017 PROXY STATEMENT		3

ii

2017 PROXY STATEMENT		4

CONCHO RESOURCES INC.

One Concho Center

600 West Illinois Avenue

Midland, Texas 79701

PROXY STATEMENT

2014 ANNUAL MEETINGELECTION OF STOCKHOLDERSDIRECTORS(PROPOSAL1)

This Proxy Statement is being furnished to you in connection withCurrently the solicitation of proxies by theCompany’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) is comprised of Concho Resources Inc. (the “Company”) for use at the Company’s 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”). The Board of Directors of the Company requests your proxy for the Annual Meeting that will be held on Thursday, June 5, 2014, at 10:00 a.m. Central Time, at the Petroleum Club of Midland, 501 West Wall Avenue, Midland, Texas 79701. By granting a proxy, you authorize the persons named in the proxy to represent you and vote your shares at the Annual Meeting. Those persons will also be authorized to vote your shares to adjourn the Annual Meeting from time to time and to vote your shares at any adjournments or postponements of the Annual Meeting.

If you attend the Annual Meeting, you may vote in person. If you are not present at the Annual Meeting, your shares may be voted only by a person to whom you have given a proper proxy.

You may revoke your proxy in writing at any time before it is exercised at the Annual Meeting by: (i) delivering to the General Counsel of the Company a written notice of the revocation; (ii) signing, dating and delivering to the General Counsel of the Company a proxynine highly qualified directors with a later date; or (iii) attending the Annual Meeting and voting your shares in person. Your attendance at the Annual Meeting will not revoke your proxy unless you give written notice of revocation to the General Counsel of the Company before your proxy is exercised or unless you vote your shares in person at the Annual Meeting before your proxy is exercised.

Brokers are not permitted to vote your shares for discretionary matters, which include the election of directors and the advisory vote to approve executive compensation, without your instructions as to how to vote. Please return your proxy card so that your vote can be counted.

DELIVERY OF PROXY MATERIALS

The approximate date on which this Proxy Statement, accompanying Notice of 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and proxy card, and the Company’s 2013 Annual Report to Stockholders are first being sent or given to stockholders is April 22, 2014.

This Notice and Proxy Statement, along with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 and the Company’s 2013 Annual Report to Stockholders, are available free of charge atwww.concho.com/proxy.

QUORUM AND VOTING

Voting Stock.    The Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share, is the only outstanding class of the Company’s securities that entitles holders to vote generally at meetings of the Company’s stockholders. Each share of common stock outstanding on the record date entitles the holder to one vote at the Annual Meeting.

Record Date.    The record date for stockholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting is the close of business on April 7, 2014. As of the record date, 105,237,144 shares of common stock were outstanding and entitled to be voted at the Annual Meeting.

Quorum and Adjournments.    A quorum of stockholders is necessary to have a valid meeting of stockholders. The presence, in person or by proxy, of the holders of a majority of the votes eligible to be cast at the Annual Meeting is necessary to constitute a quorum at the Annual Meeting. If a quorum is not present, the chairman has the power to adjourn the Annual Meeting from time to time, without notice other than an announcement at the Annual Meeting, until a quorum is present. In the event a quorum is present at the Annual Meeting but sufficient votes to approve any of the items proposed by the Board of Directors have not been received, the persons named as proxies may propose one or more adjournments of the Annual Meeting to permit further solicitation of proxies. At any annual meeting reconvened following an adjournment at which a quorum is present, any business may be transacted that might have been transacted at the annual meeting as originally noticed.

Vote Required.    Only stockholders of record at the close of business on April 7, 2014 have the right to vote at the Annual Meeting. The proposals at the Annual Meeting will require the following votes:

An automated system that the Company’s transfer agent administers will tabulate the votes.

Brokers who hold shares in street name for customers are required to vote shares in accordance with instructions received from the beneficial owners. The New York Stock Exchange’s (the “NYSE”) Rule 452 restricts when brokers who are record holders of shares may exercise discretionary authority to vote those shares. Brokers are permitted to vote on discretionary items if they have not received instructions from the beneficial owners, but they are not permitted to vote (a “broker non-vote”) on non-discretionary items absent instructions from the beneficial owner. With respect to the Annual Meeting, Rule 452 prohibits such brokers from exercising discretionary authority in the election of the Company’s directorsbusiness and the advisory vote to approve the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers but such brokers may exercise discretionary authority with respect to the ratification of the selection of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm.

Abstentions and broker non-votes will be included for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present at the Annual Meeting. Neither abstentions nor broker non-votes will have any effect on the outcome of voting on any of the proposals at the Annual Meeting.

Default Voting.    A proxy that is properly completed and returned will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the instructions on the proxy. If you properly complete and return a proxy, but do not indicate any contrary voting instructions, your shares will be voted in accordance with the Board of Director’s recommendations, which are as follows:

If any other business properly comes before the stockholders for a vote at the Annual Meeting, your shares will be voted at the discretion of the holders of the proxy. The Board of Directors knows of no matters, other than those previously stated herein, to be presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting.

Record Name and Street Name Shares.    Shares held directly in your name as the stockholder of record can be voted in person at the Annual Meeting, or you can provide a proxy to be voted at the Annual Meeting. You may vote by mail by signing, dating and returning the enclosed proxy card in the enclosed envelope. If you plan to vote in person at the Annual Meeting, please bring proof of identification. Even if you currently plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we recommend that you also submit your proxy as described above so that your vote will be counted if you later decide not to attend the Annual Meeting.

If you hold your shares in “street name” (for example, at your brokerage account), please follow the instructions provided by your record holder to vote the enclosed proxy card by signing and dating the enclosed proxy card and returning it in the enclosed postage-paid envelope. Shares held in street name may be voted in person by you at the Annual Meeting only if you obtain a signed proxy from your bank, broker or other holder of record (the record holder) giving you the right to vote the shares. If you hold your shares in street name and wish to simply attend the Annual Meeting, please bring proof of ownership and proof of identification.

ITEM ONE:    ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

The Company has classified its Board of Directors into three classes. Directors in each class are elected to serve for three-year terms and until either they are re-elected or their successors are elected and qualified or until their earlier resignation or removal. Each year, the directors of one class stand for re-election as their terms of office expire. Based on recommendations from its Nominating & Governance Committee, the Board of Directors has nominated the following individuals for election as Class I directors of the Company with their terms to expire at the Company’s 2017 annual meeting of stockholders, when they are to be re-elected or their successors are elected and qualified or until their earlier resignation or removal:

Timothy A. Leach

William H. Easter III

John P. Surma

Messrs. Leach, Easter and Surma currently serve as Class I directors of the Company. Their biographical information is contained in “Directors and Executive Officers” below.

The Board of Directors has no reason to believe that any of its nominees will be unable or unwilling to serve if elected. If a nominee becomes unable or unwilling to accept nomination or election, either the number of the Company’s directors will be reduced or the persons acting under your proxy will vote for the election of a substitute nominee that the Board of Directors nominates.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTEFOR THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE DIRECTOR NOMINEES.

DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The table below sets forth certain information, as of the date of this Proxy Statement, regarding the Company’s directors and executive officers:strategy:

64   2017 PROXY STATEMENT			Class I Director
Gary A. Merriman			59			Class III Director
Ray M. Poage			66			Class III Director
Mark B. Puckett			62			Class II Director
John P. Surma			59			Class I Director
A. Wellford Tabor			45			Class III Director
C. William Giraud			34			Executive Vice President, Chief Commercial Officer and Corporate Secretary
Jack F. Harper			42			Executive Vice President
E. Joseph Wright			54			Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
J. Steve Guthrie			52			Senior Vice President of Business Operations and Engineering
Darin G. Holderness			50			Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Matthew G. Hyde			58			Senior Vice President of Exploration5

Set forth below is biographical

The following section provides information aboutwith respect to each of the Company’s executive officers and directors. Executive officers serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors.

Timothy A. Leach has been the Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of the Company since its formation in February 2006 and the President of the Company since July 2009. Mr. Leach was the Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of Concho Equity Holdings Corp. from its formation in April 2004 until it was merged into another subsidiary of the Company in December 2008. Mr. Leach was Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Concho Oil & Gas Corp. from its formation in January 2001 until its sale in January 2004. From January 2004 to April 2004, Mr. Leach was involved in private investments. Mr. Leach was Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Concho Resources Inc. (which was a different company than the Company) from its formation in August 1997 until its sale in June 2001. From September 1989 until May 1997, Mr. Leach was employed by Parker & Parsley Petroleum Company (now Pioneer Natural Resources Company) in a variety of capacities, including servingnominee for election as Executive Vice President and as a member of its Executive Committee. He is a graduate of Texas A&M University with a Bachelor of Science degree in Petroleum Engineering.

Steven L. Beal has been a director since the Company’s formation in February 2006 and currently serves as a member of the Reserves Committee. Mr. Beal was a consultant to the Company from July 2009 to August 2013. Mr. Beal was the President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company from its formation in February 2006 until his retirement effective June 30, 2009. Mr. Beal was a director and the President and Chief Operating Officer of Concho Equity Holdings Corp. from its formation in April 2004 until it was merged into another subsidiary of the Company in December 2008. Mr. Beal was a director and the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Concho Oil & Gas Corp. from its formation in January 2001 until he became its President and Chief Operating Officer in August 2002, a position he held until its sale in January 2004. From

January 2004 to April 2004, Mr. Beal was involved in private investments. Mr. Beal was a director and the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Concho Resources Inc. (which was a different company than the Company) from its formation in August 1997 until its sale in June 2001. From October 1988 until May 1997, Mr. Beal was employed by Parker & Parsley Petroleum Company (now Pioneer Natural Resources Company) in a variety of capacities, including serving as its Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and as a member of its Executive Committee. From 1981 until February 1988, Mr. Beal was employed by the accounting firm of Price Waterhouse (now PricewaterhouseCoopers). Mr. Beal is also a director of First Financial Bankshares, Inc. He is a graduate of the University of Texas with a Bachelor of Business Administration degree in Accounting.

Tucker S. Bridwell has been a director of the Company since February 2006 and currently serves as a member of the Reserves Committee. Mr. Bridwell was a director of Concho Equity Holdings Corp. from its inception in April 2004 until February 2006. Mr. Bridwell has been the President of each of the Mansefeldt Investment Corporation and the Dian Graves Owen Foundation since September 1997 and manages investments for both entities; both of which are stockholders of the Company. He has been in the energy business in various capacities for over twenty-five years. Mr. Bridwell served as Chairman of the Board of Directors of First Permian, LLC from 2000 until its salewho will continue to Energen Corporation in April 2002 andserve as a director of Petrohawk Energy Corporation from May 2004 until December 2010. Mr. Bridwell is also a director of First Financial Bankshares, Inc.following this year’s Annual Meeting. This information includes the specific experience, qualifications and Halcon Resources Corporation. He is a graduate of Southern Methodist University with a Bachelor of Business Administration degree and a Master of Business Administration degree and is a certified public accountant.

William H. Easter III has been a director of the Company since February 2008 and currently serves as a member of the Audit Committee and the Compensation Committee. From 2004 until his retirement in 2008, Mr. Easter served as the Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief Executive Officer of DCP Midstream, LLC (formerly Duke Energy Field Services, LLC). From 2002 through 2004, Mr. Easter served as Vice President of State Government Affairs for ConocoPhillips, and from 1998 to 2002, Mr. Easter served as General Manager of the Gulf Coast Refining, Marketing and Transportation Business Unit of Conoco Inc. Since his retirement from DCP Midstream, LLC, Mr. Easter has been involved in private investments. He is currently a director of Delta Airlines Inc. He has previously served as director of TEPPCO GP, LLC, the general partner of TEPPCO Partners, L.P., from January 2004 until February 2005; as a director of DCP Midstream GP, LLC, the general partner of DCP Midstream Partners, LP, from November 2005 to January 2008; and as a director of both Sunoco, Inc. and Sunoco Partners, LLC, the General Partner of Sunoco Logistics Partners L.P., from November 2011 until October 2012. He is also a director of the Memorial Hermann Hospital System in Houston and the Texas Tri-Cities Chapter of the National Association of Corporate Directors. He earned his Bachelor of Business Administration degree in Finance from the University of Houston and his Master of Science in Management degree from The Graduate School of Business at Stanford University.

Gary A. Merriman has been a director of the Company since January 2012 and currently serves as the Chairman of the Compensation Committee and as a member of the Reserves Committee. Mr. Merriman began his career at Conoco Inc. in 1976 and held various engineering and supervisory positions of increasing responsibility throughout his career at Conoco, including as a production superintendent in West Texas, President of Conoco Indonesia Inc. and General Manager of Conoco’s Rockies business unit. Mr. Merriman ultimately retired in 2002 as the President of Exploration and Production, Americas, where he was responsible for Conoco’s operation in the U.S. and South America. Since his retirement, Mr. Merriman has been involved in private investments. Previously, Mr. Merriman served as a director of KCS Energy Inc. from April 2005 to July 2006 and a director of Petrohawk Energy Corporation from July 2006 to August 2011. Mr. Merriman earned a Bachelor’s degree in Petroleum Engineering from Marietta College and a Master’s degree in Management from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Ray M. Poage has been a director of the Company since August 2007 and serves as the Chairman of the Audit Committee and as a member ofskills considered by the Nominating & Governance Committee and the Reserves Committee.Board in assessing the appropriateness of the person to serve as director.

Class I Nominees

2017 PROXY STATEMENT		6

Mr. Poage was a partner in KPMG LLP from 1980 to June 2002, when he retired.

2017 PROXY STATEMENT		7

Class II Directors

2017 PROXY STATEMENT		8

Class III Directors

2017 PROXY STATEMENT		9

Summary of Director Qualifications

The members of the Board have a diversity of Directorsexperience and a wide variety of Parallel Petroleum Corporation. Mr. Poage received a Bachelor of Business Administration degree in Accounting from Texas Tech University.

Mark B. Puckett has been a directorskills, qualifications and viewpoints that strengthen their ability to carry out their oversight role on behalf of the Company since November 2009 and currently serves asCompany’s stockholders. The following highlights the Lead Director,key characteristics the ChairmanBoard believes qualifies its current members to serve the interests of the Reserves CommitteeCompany’s stockholders.

Summary of Qualifications and as a member ofExperience Represented by the Nominating & Governance Committee and the Audit Committee. Mr. Puckett began his career at Chevron in 1973 and retired in May 2008. During his tenure at Chevron, Mr. Puckett held a variety of positions of increasing responsibility in Chevron’s upstream operations before ultimately retiring as the President of Chevron’s Energy Technology Company, where he was responsible for managing the company’s technology resources across all business segments. In addition, Mr. Puckett served on Chevron’s management committee from 1997 until his retirement and served on Chevron’s upstream and gas leadership team from 2001 until his retirement. Since his retirement, Mr. Puckett has been involved in private investments and is a director of a privately held company. He is a member of the Society of Petroleum Engineers and the Dean’s Advisory Council, College of Engineering at Texas A&M University. Mr. Puckett earned a Bachelor’s degree in Civil Engineering from Texas A&M University.Board

John P. Surma has been a director of the Company since March 2014 and currently serves as a member of the Audit Committee and Reserves Committee. Mr. Surma is also currently a member of the boards of directors of Marathon Petroleum Corporation, Ingersoll-Rand plc and MPLX GP LLC, the general partner of MPLX LP. Additionally, Mr. Surma is on the boards of directors of the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland and the National Safety Council. He was appointed by President Barack Obama to the President’s Advisory Committee for Trade Policy and Negotiations and serves as its vice chairman. Mr. Surma retired as the chief executive officer of United States Steel Corporation effective September 1, 2013, and as executive chairman effective December 31, 2013. Prior to joining United States Steel Corporation in September 2001, Mr. Surma served in several executive positions with Marathon Petroleum Corporation. Prior to joining Marathon Petroleum Corporation, Mr. Surma worked for Price Waterhouse LLP where he was admitted to the partnership in 1987. Mr. Surma earned a Bachelor of Science degree in accounting from Pennsylvania State University in 1976.

A. Wellford Tabor has been a director of the Company since February 2006 and currently serves as the Chairman of the Nominating & Governance Committee and as a member of the Compensation Committee. Mr. Tabor was a director of Concho Equity Holdings Corp. from its inception in April 2004 until February 2006. Mr. Tabor also served as a director of Concho Oil & Gas Corp. from March 2003 until its sale in January 2004. Mr. Tabor is currently the Managing Partner of Keeneland Capital. Prior to founding Keeneland Capital in 2009, Mr. Tabor was a Partner with Wachovia Capital Partners. Mr. Tabor was a Director at The Beacon Group from 1995 to 2000. From 1991 to 1993, he worked in the Investment Banking Division at Morgan Stanley & Co. Mr. Tabor is also a director of VantageSouth Bank, Inc. and several privately held companies. Mr. Tabor earned his undergraduate degree from the University of Virginia and his Master of Business Administration degree from The Graduate School of Business at Stanford University.

2017 PROXY STATEMENT		10

C. William Giraud has been the Executive Vice President, Chief Commercial Officer and Corporate Secretary of the Company since November 2013. Mr. Giraud was the Senior Vice President, Chief Commercial Officer and Corporate Secretary of the Company from May 2013 to November 2013. Mr. Giraud was the Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of the Company from October 2010 to May 2013. Mr. Giraud was the Vice President — General Counsel and Secretary of the Company from November 2009 to October 2010. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Giraud practiced corporate and securities law at Vinson & Elkins, L.L.P. He is a graduate of Wake Forest University with a Bachelor of Arts degree in Economics and a graduate of the University of Texas School of Law with a Doctor of Jurisprudence degree.

Jack F. Harper has been the Executive Vice President of the Company since March 2014. From January 2013 until March 2014, Mr. Harper was involved in private investments. Mr. Harper previously served as the

Senior Vice President and Chief of Staff of the Company from November 2010 until January 2013. From May 2007 to October 2010, Mr. Harper was the Vice President — Business Development and Capital Markets of the Company. Mr. Harper was the Director of Investor Relations and Business Development of the Company from July 2006 until May 2007. From October 2005 until July 2006, Mr. Harper was involved in private investments. From October 2002 until October 2005, Mr. Harper was employed by Unocal Corporation, where he served as Manager of Planning and Evaluation and Manager of Business Development for Unocal Corporation’s wholly owned subsidiary, Pure Resources, Inc. From May 2000 until October 2002, Mr. Harper was employed by Pure Resources, Inc. in a variety of capacities, including in his last position as Vice President, Finance and Investor Relations. From December 1996 until May 2000, Mr. Harper was employed by Tom Brown, Inc., where his last position was Vice President, Investor Relations, Corporate Development and Treasurer. He is a graduate of Baylor University with a Bachelor of Business Administration degree in Finance.

E. Joseph Wright has been the Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company since November 2013. Mr. Wright was the Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer from November 2010 to November 2013. Mr. Wright was the Vice President — Engineering and Operations since the Company’s formation in February 2006 to October 2010. Mr. Wright was the Vice President — Operations & Engineering of Concho Equity Holdings Corp. from its formation in April 2004 until it was merged into another subsidiary of the Company in December 2008. Mr. Wright was Vice President — Operations/Engineering of Concho Oil & Gas Corp. from its formation in January 2001 until its sale in January 2004. From January 2004 to April 2004, Mr. Wright was involved in private investments. Mr. Wright served in various engineering and operations positions for Concho Resources Inc. (which was a different company than the Company), including serving as its Vice President — Operations, from 1998 until its sale in June 2001. From 1982 until February 1998, Mr. Wright was employed by Mewbourne Oil Company in several operations, engineering and capital markets positions. He is a graduate of Texas A&M University with a Bachelor of Science degree in Petroleum Engineering.

J. Steve Guthriehas been the Senior Vice President of Business Operations and Engineering of the Company since November 2013. Mr. Guthrie previously served as the Vice President of Texas of the Company from October 2010 to November 2013. Mr. Guthrie also served as Texas Asset Manager of the Company from July 2008 to October 2010 and as Corporate Engineering Manager from August 2004 to July 2008. Prior to joining the Company in 2004, Mr. Guthrie was employed by Moriah Resources as Business Development Manager, by Henry Petroleum in various engineering and operations capacities and by Exxon in several engineering and operations positions. Mr. Guthrie is a graduate of Texas Tech University with a Bachelor of Science degree in Petroleum Engineering.

Darin G. Holderness has been the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company since October 2012. Mr. Holderness was the Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer from October 2010 to October 2012 and was the Vice President — Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company from August 2008 to October 2010. From May 2008 until August 2008, Mr. Holderness was employed by Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P. as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. From November 2004 until May 2008, Mr. Holderness served as Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of Pioneer Natural Resources Company. Mr. Holderness holds a Bachelor of Business Administration degree in Accounting from Boise State University and is a certified public accountant.

Matthew G. Hyde has been the Senior Vice President of Exploration of the Company since October 2010. From November 2008 to October 2010, Mr. Hyde was the Vice President — Exploration and Land. Mr. Hyde was the Vice President — Exploration of the Company from May 2008 until November 2008. From January 2008 to May 2008, Mr. Hyde was involved in private investments. From March 2001 to December 2007, Mr. Hyde was an Asset Manager of Oxy Permian, a business unit of Occidental Petroleum Corporation. From April 1998 to February 2001, Mr. Hyde served as President and General Manager of Occidental Petroleum Corporation’s international business unit in Oman. Prior to that role, Mr. Hyde served in a variety of domestic and international exploration positions for Occidental Petroleum Corporation, including Regional Exploration Manager responsible for Latin American exploration activities. He is a graduate of the University of Vermont

and the University of Massachusetts where he obtained Bachelor of Arts and Master of Science degrees, respectively, in Geology. Mr. Hyde also holds a Master of Business Administration degree from the University of California Los Angeles.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Corporate Governance Guidelines

The Board of Directors believes that sound governance practices and policies provide an important framework to assist it in fulfilling its duty to stockholders. The Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines include provisions concerning the following:

The Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines are posted on the Company’s website atwww.concho.com/governance.www.concho.com under “Investors – Corporate Governance – Committee Composition and Governance Documents.” The Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines are reviewed periodicallyat least annually and as necessary by the Company’s Nominating & Governance Committee, and any proposed additions to or amendments of the Corporate Governance Guidelines will be presented to the Board of Directors for its approval.

Anti-Pledging Policy

As discussed more fully below, in March 2014, the Company made certain modifications in its Insider Trading Policy to expressly prohibit directors and officers from purchasing Company securities on margin and pledging such securities as security for loans.

Director Independence

Rather than adopting categorical standards, theThe Board of Directors assesses director independence on acase-by-case basis, in each case consistent with applicable legal requirements and the listing standards of the NYSE. After reviewing all relationships each director has with the Company, including the nature and extent of any business relationships between the Company and each director, as well as any significant charitable contributions the Company makes to organizations where its directors serve as board members or executive officers, the Board of Directors has affirmatively determined that the following directors have no material relationships with the Company and are independent as defined by the current listing standards of the NYSE: Ms. Helms and Messrs. Beal, Easter, Merriman, Poage, Puckett Surma and Tabor.Surma. In making its independence determinations, the Board of Directors took into account the relationships and recommendations of the Nominating and Governance Committee as described below, as well as the transactions discussed under “Related Person Transactions.”

Mr. Beal is considered to be an independent director due to the lapse of time that has occurred since Mr. Beal was an executive officer and consultant of the Company.

During 2016, the Company engaged Baker Hughes Inc. in connection with its oil and gas exploration, development and production activities. Mr. Easter currently serves as a member of the board of directors of Baker Hughes Inc. The Nominating and Governance Committee made a determination that the relationship with Baker Hughes Inc. did not impair the independence of Mr. Easter. Mr. Leach, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and President, is not considered by the Board of Directors to be an independent director because of his employment with the Company. Mr. Beal is not considered to be an independent director because of his previous position as an executive officer of the Company and his previous role as a paid consultant to the Company.

Mr. Bridwell is not considered to be an independent director because of the Company’s payment of royalties to a partnership of which Mr. Bridwell is the general partner.

Board Leadership Structure, Election of Lead Director and Executive Sessions

The Board of Directors does not have a formal policy addressing whether or not the roles of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer should be separate or combined. The directors serving on the Board of Directors possess considerable professional and industry experience, significant experience as directors of both public and private companies and a unique knowledge of the challenges and opportunities that the Company faces. As such, the Board of Directors believes that it is in the best position to evaluate the needs of the Company and to determine how best to organize the Company’s leadership structure to meet those needs.

At present, the Board of Directors of the Company has chosen to combine the positions of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. While the Board of Directors believes it is important to retain the flexibility to determine whether the roles of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer should be separated or combined in one individual, the Board of Directors believes that the current Chief Executive Officer is the individual with the necessary experience, commitment and support of the other members of the Board of Directors to effectively carry out the role of Chairman.

The Board of Directors believes this structure promotes better alignment of strategic development and execution, more effective implementation of strategic initiatives and clearer accountability for the Company’s success or failure. Moreover, the Board of Directors believes that combining the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer positions does not impede independent oversight of the Company. SixCompany, particularly given the appointment of a Lead Director as discussed below. In addition, seven of the nine members of the Board of Directors are independent under NYSE listing standards.

2017 PROXY STATEMENT		11

Executive Sessions; Election of Lead Director

To facilitate candid discussion among the Company’s directors, the non-management directors meet in executive session in conjunction with each regular board meeting and as otherwise determined by the Lead Director.

The Board of Directors elected Mr. Puckett, an independent director, to serve as the Lead Director. In this capacity Mr. Puckett provides, in conjunction with the Chairman, leadership and guidance to the Board of Directors.Board. As the Lead Director, Mr. Puckett also (i) serves as chairman of executive sessions of thenon-management directors and (ii) in consultation with the Chairman, establishes the agenda for each meeting of the Board, of Directors, taking into account the suggestions of other directors. Interested parties who wish to communicate with the Board, of Directors, its committees, the Chairman, the Lead Director or any other individual director should follow the procedures described below under “Interested Party“Stockholder Communications.”

To facilitate candid discussion among the Company’s directors, thenon-management directors meet in executive session in conjunction with each regular board meeting and as otherwise determined by the Lead Director. In addition, at least once a year, thenon-management directors who are independent under NYSE listing standards meet in executive session in conjunction with a regular board meeting.

Majority Voting for Directors

Though the Company’s bylaws provide for the election of directors by a pluralitymajority of the votes cast, its Corporate Governance Guidelines require any director who receives morefails to receive the required number of votes withheld than votes for to tender his or her resignation. In such event, the Nominating & Governance Committee would determine whether to accept such director’s resignation, subject to the Board of Directors’Board’s final approval. The Company believes that this majority vote standard ensures accountability and the opportunity for a positive mandate forfrom the Company’s stockholders.

BoardThe Role of Directors’ Rolethe Board in Risk Oversight

In the normal course of its business, the Company is exposed to a variety of risks, including market risks relating to changes in commodity prices and interest rates, technical risks affecting the Company’s resource base, political risks and credit and investment risk. The Company’s executive officers attend all regularly scheduled meetings of the Board, of Directors, where they conduct presentations to the Board of Directors on various strategic matters involving the Company’s operations and are available to address any questions or concerns raised by the Board of Directors on risk management or any other matters. The Board, of Directorsas a whole and also at the committee level, oversees the strategic direction of the Company, and in doing so considers the potential rewards and risks of the Company’s

business opportunities and challenges, and monitors the development and management of risks that impact the Company’s strategic goals.

The Audit Committee assists the Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities by monitoring the effectiveness of the Company’s systems of financial reporting, auditing, internal controls and legal and regulatory compliance. In 2011, the Board of Directors established a Reserves Committee to assist the Board of Directors in its oversight of the risks related to the Company’s estimates of proved reserves of oil and natural gas. ToAdditionally, to address risks related to the Company’s hedging program, a group consisting of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer, Treasurer and Mr. Easter, an independent director, and other members of management regularly review the Company’s hedging strategy and positions and make reports to the full Board of Directors.Board.

Director Qualifications

A number of the members ofThe Nominating & Governance Committee advises the Board of Directors have served as members of senior management and/or directors of other publicwith respect to appropriate corporate governance practices and private companies. In addition, all members ofassists the Board of Directors have extensive experience in implementing those practices as well as considers any other corporate governance issues that arise from time to time. Additionally, the oilNominating & Governance Committee reviews the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines at least annually and natural gas or other extractive industriesrecommends any proposed changes to the Board for approval. The Compensation Committee considers the risks associated with the Company’s compensation policies and are familiarpractices, with board processes.

More specifically, Mr. Leach has been Chairmanrespect to both executive compensation and Chief Executive Officercompensation generally. The Compensation Committee also reviews, approves and administers the agreements, plans, policies and programs of the Company since its formationto compensate the Company’s corporate officers and President since July 2009. Mr. Beal served asdirectors and reviews and approves the Presidentplans, policies and Chief Operating Officerprograms of the Company from its formation until his retirement in June 2009. Mr. Beal also served as a consultant to the Company from July 2009 to August 2013. In addition, both men previously served as executive officers of two Permian Basin-focused private oil and natural gas companies and in varying executive roles at Parker & Parsley Petroleum Company (now Pioneer Natural Resources Company). Messrs. Leach and Beal’s deep knowledge of the Company and the industry as a result of their long tenure with the Company and previous companies make them valuable members of the Board of Directors.

Mr. Easter’s experience as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of DCP Midstream, LLC and his current service on the board of directors of Delta Airlines and his previous service on the board of directors of TEPPCO GP LLC, Sunoco, Inc. and Sunoco Partners, LLC has provided him with midstream and natural gas marketing expertise, as well as valuable management skills. Mr. Merriman, as a result of his 26 year career at Conoco, Inc. and his recent service on the board of a similarly sized exploration and production company provides the Board of Directors with insight into asset management and operations. Mr. Puckett, as a result of his 35 year career at Chevron Corporation, provides the Board of Directors a valuable source of engineering, drilling and oil and natural gas operations management expertise. Mr. Surma’s significant experience as an executive in the energy and steel industries, particularly his expertise in finance and accounting, and his current service on the board of directors of Marathon Petroleum Corporation, Ingersoll-Rand plc and MPLX GP LLC, the general partner of MPLX LP, brings important experience and skill to the Board of Directors. In addition, as the Company expects to continue to grow in size and scale, the Board of Directors will benefit from Messrs. Easter, Merriman, Puckett and Surma’s experience in managing large organizations.

Messrs. Bridwell and Tabor each bring decades worth of experience in energy finance and oil and natural gas investments, as well as knowledge gained through past and current service on the board of directors of various public and private companies in the energy industry. Each is familiar with the issues, trends and opportunities within the industry, providingcompensate the Company’s management with meaningful relationships and supplying the Board of Directors with critical expertise when evaluating potential acquisition opportunities and exploration projects.non-executive employees.

Mr. Poage spent the majority of his 30 years of service at KPMG LLP advising oil and natural gas companies on accounting and tax matters, which assists the Board of Directors when dealing with tax, audit and other accounting matters. In addition, his recent service as the chair of the audit committee of another public exploration and production company gives him valuable perspective on issues facing audit committees.

Attendance at Annual Meetings

The Board of Directors encourages all directors to attend the annual meetings of stockholders, if practicable. FourSeven of the Company’s directors attended last year’s annual meeting.

Interested PartyStockholder Communications

The Company’s stockholders and other interested persons may communicate with the Board, of Directors, any committee of the Board, of Directors, the Chairman of the Board, of Directors, the Lead Director or any other individual director by sending communications to: Concho Resources Inc., One Concho Center, 600 West Illinois Avenue, Midland, Texas 79701, Attention: General Counsel.

The envelope containing each communication should be marked “Communication with Directors” and clearly identify the intended recipient(s) of the communication. The Company’s General Counsel will review each communication received from stockholders and other interested parties and will forward the communication, as expeditiously as reasonably practicable, to the addressees if the communication: (i) complies with the requirements of any applicable policy adopted by the Board of Directors relating to the subject matter of the communication; and (ii) falls within the scope of matters generally considered by the Board of Directors.Board. To the extent the subject matter of a communication relates to matters that have been delegated by the Board of Directors to a committee or to an executive officer of the Company, the Company’s General Counsel may forward the communication to the chairperson of the

2017 PROXY STATEMENT		12

committee or executive officer to which the matter has been delegated. The acceptance by and forwarding of communication to the members of the Board, of Directors, the Company’s General Counsel or an executive officer does not imply or create any fiduciary duty of any member of the Board, of Directors, the Company’s General Counsel or any executive officer to the person submitting the communication.

Information may be submitted confidentially and anonymously, although the Company may be obligated by law to disclose the information or identity of the person providing the information in connection with government or private legal actions and in other circumstances. The Company’s policy is not to take any adverse action, and not to tolerate any retaliation, against any person for asking questions or making good faith reports of possible violations of law, the Company’s policies or its Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.

Available Governance Materials

The following materials are available on the Company’s website atwww.concho.com under “Investors – Corporate Governance – Committee Composition and Governance Documents”:

Stockholders may obtain a copy, free of charge, of each of these documents by sending a written request to Concho Resources Inc., One Concho Center, 600 West Illinois Avenue, Midland, Texas 79701, Attention: General Counsel.

MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES OF DIRECTORS

General

The Board of Directors held seven meetings, and its independent directors met in executive session four times, during 2013. No director attended fewer than 75% of the meetings of the Board of Directors and of the committees of the Board of Directors on which that director served.Its Committees

The Board of Directors has four standing committees: the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Nominating & Governance Committee and the Reserves Committee. A summary of committee membership is provided in the table below.

The Board held ten meetings, and itsnon-management directors met in executive session four times, during 2016. Each director attended more than 75% of the meetings of the Board of Directors and of the committees of the Board on which that director served.

Audit Committee

The members of the Audit Committee are Messrs. Poage (Chairman), Beal, Easter, Puckett and Surma. The Board of Directors has determined that each of the members of the Audit Committee satisfies the standards of independence established under Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules and regulations and the listing standards of the NYSE. The Board of Directors has further determined that each of the members of the Audit Committee is financially literate and that Mr. Poage is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the rules and regulations of the SEC. The Audit Committee held eightsix meetings during 2013.2016.

The Audit Committee has the authority to appoint, retain, compensate, evaluate and terminate the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. The functions of the Audit Committee, which are discussed in detail in its charter, include the duty to assist the Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities regarding general oversight of the integrity of the Company’s financial statements, the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, and the independent registered public accounting firm’s qualifications, independence and performance. performance, and the effectiveness and performance of the Company’s internal audit function.

2017 PROXY STATEMENT		13

Among other things, the Audit Committee is responsible for Committee’s responsibilities include the following:

Compensation Committee

The members of the Compensation Committee are Messrs. Merriman (Chairman), Easter and Tabor.Surma. The Board of Directors has determined that each of the members of the Compensation Committee satisfies the standards of independence established under the applicable SEC rules and regulations and the listing standards of the NYSE. The Compensation Committee held nine meetings during 2013.2016.

The functions of the Compensation Committee, which are discussed in detail in its charter, include the duty to administer the Company’s agreements, plans, policies and programs regarding compensation of the Company’s executive officers and directors. The Compensation Committee is also responsible for preparing the Compensation Committee Report for inclusion in the Company’s proxy statement and for assisting the Company’s management in preparing the Compensation Discussion and Analysis for inclusion in the Company’s proxy statement.

The Compensation Committee is delegated all authority of the Board of Directors as may be required or advisable to fulfill the purposes of the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee may form and delegate some or all of its authority to subcommittees when it deems appropriate.

Meetings may, at the discretion of the Compensation Committee, includenon-independent directors, members of the Company’s management, independent consultants or advisors, and such other persons as the Compensation Committee or its chairperson may determine. The Compensation Committee Chairman makes decisions regarding the agenda for regularly scheduled meetings and develops the agenda for special meetings based on information supplied by the

person requesting the special meeting.determine to be necessary or appropriate. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee regarding the compensation of other executive officers and provides information to the Compensation Committee regarding the other executive officers’ performance; however, the Compensation Committee makes all final decisions regarding all executive officers’ compensation.

The Compensation Committee has the sole authority to retain, approve the fees payable to, amend the engagement with and terminate any compensation consultant to be used to assist in the evaluation of director and executive officer compensation. Beginning in 2011, the Compensation Committee engaged Meridian Compensation Partners (“Meridian”) yearly as its independent consultant. Services Meridian may provide include apprising the Compensation Committee of compensation-related trends,trends; developments in the marketplace and industry best practices; informing the Compensation Committee of compensation-related regulatory developments; providing peer group survey data to establish compensation ranges for the various elements of compensation; providing an evaluation of the competitiveness of the Company’snon-employee director and executive compensation and benefits programs; assessing the relationship between executive pay and performance; and advising on the design of the Company’s incentive compensation programs.

Nominating & Governance Committee

The members of the Nominating & Governance Committee are Messrs. TaborPuckett (Chairman), PoageBeal, Easter and Puckett.Poage. The Board of Directors has determined that each of the members of the Nominating & Governance Committee satisfies the standards of independence established under the listing standards of the NYSE. The Nominating & Governance Committee held four meetings during 2013.2016.

The functions of the Nominating & Governance Committee, which are discussed in detail in its charter, include the duty to assist the Board of Directors by evaluating potential new members of the Board, of Directors, recommending committee members and structure and advising the Board of Directors about appropriate corporate governance practices. In identifying potential director candidates, the Nominating & Governance Committee relies on any source available for the identification and recommendation of candidates, including current directors and senior management. In addition, the Nominating & Governance Committee from time to time will engage a third party search firm to identify or evaluate, or assist in identifying or evaluating potential candidates, for which the third party search firm will be paid a fee. The search firm will also assist the Nominating & Governance Committee to identify candidates reflecting diversity, including with regard to race, gender and specialized experience.

The Company’s Policies and Procedures Relating to Disclosures Required by Item 407 of RegulationS-K provide that in identifying, evaluating and recommending director nominees to the Board, of Directors director nominees, the Nominating & Governance Committee shall identify persons who (i) who:

2017 PROXY STATEMENT		14

The Nominating & Governance Committee will consider all candidates recommended by any stockholder on the same basis as candidates recommended by the Board of Directors and other sources. While

The Nominating and Governance Committee’s charter requires consideration of the diversity of, and the optimal enhancement of, the current mix of talent and experience on the Board. In that regard, the Nominating and Governance Committee endeavors to achieve an overall variety and mix of diversity in professional experiences, skills, perspective, race and gender among the Company’s directors. The Nominating and Governance Committee believes the current members of the Board of Directors does not have a formal policy on diversity,reflect diverse experience in selecting nominees, the oil and gas industry and accounting and investment analysis fields, among other areas, as well as demonstrated leadership experience. The Nominating &and Governance Committee seekswill continue to have a Board of Directors that represents a diverse range of perspectives and experience relevantseek opportunities to the Company.enhance this diversity.

In determining whether to recommend a director forre-election to the Board of Directors, in accordance with such policies and procedures, the Nominating & Governance Committee considers the director’s:

Reserves Committee

The members of the Reserves Committee are Ms. Helms and Messrs. PuckettBeal (Chairman), Beal, Bridwell, Merriman Poage and Surma.Poage. The Reserves Committee was formed in 2011 to assist the Board of Directorsand Audit Committee with oversight in the preparation by independent petroleum engineers of annual reserve reports, special reserve reports and audits of the estimated amounts of the Company’s consolidated oil and natural gas reserves and related information by independent petroleum engineers.information. The Reserves Committee oversees the independent petroleum engineers who evaluate the Company’s oil and natural gas reserves and reviews the engineers’ independence from the Company annually. In addition, the Reserves Committee reviews the Company’s annual disclosures of reserves and related oil and gas activities. The Reserves Committee held five meetings during 2013.2016.

ITEM TWO:    COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS

The Board of Directors believes that providing a compensation package at the market median is necessary to attract and retain qualified directors. The Board also believes that a significant portion of the total compensation package should be equity-based to align the interests of the Company’s directors and stockholders. Mr. Leach, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and President, receives no additional compensation for his service on the Board.

The elements of compensation for the Company’snon-employee directors during the year ended December 31, 2016, were:

Time of service related forfeiture restrictions on annual equity awards of shares of the Company’s restricted stock issued to directors lapse twelve months following the grant date of the award. All retainer and attendance fees are paid quarterly in cash to directors.

Additionally, each director is reimbursed for (i) travel and miscellaneous expenses to attend meetings and activities of the Board or its committees; (ii) travel and miscellaneous expenses related to such director’s participation in the Company’s general education and orientation program for directors; and (iii) travel and miscellaneous expenses for each director’s spouse who accompanies a director to attend meetings and activities of the Board or its committees.

2017 PROXY STATEMENT		15

The table below summarizes compensation paid by the Company to itsnon-employee directors during 2016:

After a review of the Company’s director compensation program for 2017, the Company made no changes.

Director Stock Ownership Guidelines

The Compensation Committee established director stock ownership guidelines under which directors who are not also executive officers of the Company are expected to own shares of the Company’s common stock having a market value of at least $400,000. Directors are expected to meet these guidelines within three years of becoming a director. The Company’s director stock ownership guidelines are designed to increase a director’s equity stake in the Company and to align the director’s interests more closely with those of the Company’s stockholders. As of December 31, 2016, all directors were in compliance with the stock ownership guidelines.

2017 PROXY STATEMENT		16

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth information with respect to the beneficial ownership of the Company’s common stock by the following:

Unless otherwise noted, the mailing address of each person or entity named below is One Concho Center, 600 West Illinois Avenue, Midland, Texas 79701.

2017 PROXY STATEMENT		17

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

The Section 16 officers and directors of the Company and persons who own more than 10% of the Company’s common stock are required to file reports with the SEC, disclosing the amount and nature of their beneficial ownership in common stock, as well as changes in that ownership. Based solely on its review of reports and written representations that the Company has received, the Company believes that all required reports were timely filed during 2016.

RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS

The Board of Directors has determined that the Audit Committee will periodically review all related person transactions that the rules of the SEC require be disclosed in the Company’s proxy statement, and make a determination regarding the initial authorization or ratification of any such transaction.

The Audit Committee is charged with reviewing the material facts of all related person transactions and either approving or disapproving of the Company’s participation in such transactions under the Company’s Related Persons Transaction Policy adopted by the Board (“RPT Policy”) on November 7, 2012, whichpre-approves certain related person transactions, including:

2017 PROXY STATEMENT		18

The Audit Committee Chairman may approve any related person transaction in which the aggregate amount involved is expected to be less than $120,000. A summary of such approved transactions and each new related person transaction deemedpre-approved under the RPT Policy is provided to the Audit Committee for its review. The Audit Committee has the authority to modify the RPT Policy regardingpre-approved transactions or to impose conditions upon the ability of the Company to participate in any related person transaction.

There have been no related person transactions since the beginning of 2016 which were required to be reported in “Related Person Transactions” where the procedures described above did not require review, approval or ratification or where these procedures were not followed.

Royalty Payment

The Company is a lessee of certain mineral interests from a partnership in which Mr. Bridwell, one of the Company’s directors, is the general partner and in which he holds a 3.5% interest. The Company paid royalties to the partnership of approximately $4.4 million during 2016.

Oil and Gas Lease

Over the past few years, the Company has entered into oil and gas leases with Davis Partners, Ltd. Since the beginning of 2016, the total payments made in connection with these leases were approximately $163,000. Mr. Harper’s wife and her family hold a controlling interest in Davis Partners, Ltd.

Non-Operated Interests

Mr. Guthrie ownsnon-operated interests in certain oil and natural gas properties that the Company operates, all of which he owned before becoming an executive officer of the Company. During the Company’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, Mr. Guthrie received approximately $145,000 in oil and gas revenues and paid approximately $28,000 in drilling costs and operating expenses related to such interests.

Demand Registration Rights

The Company is a party to a registration rights agreement with certain of its stockholders, including certain of the Company’s executive officers and the former stockholders of Concho Equity Holdings Corp., which was later merged into a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. According to the registration rights agreement, holders of 20% of the aggregate shares held by the former stockholders of Concho Equity Holdings Corp. may request in writing that the Company register their shares by filing a registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”), so long as the anticipated aggregate offering price, net of underwriting discounts and commissions, exceeds $50 million.

Piggy-Back Registration Rights

If the Company proposes to file a registration statement under the Securities Act relating to an offering of the Company’s common stock (other than on a FormS-4, a FormS-8 or a shelf registration on FormS-3), upon the written request of holders of registrable securities, the Company will use its commercially reasonable efforts to include in such registration, and any related underwriting, all of the registrable securities requested to be included, subject to customary cutback provisions. There is no limit to the number of these “piggy-back” registrations in which these holders may request their shares be included.

Registration Procedures and Expenses

The Company generally will bear the registration expenses incurred in connection with any registration, including all registration, filing and qualification fees, printing and accounting fees, but excluding underwriting discounts and commissions. The Company has agreed to indemnify the subject stockholders against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act, in connection with any registration effected under the registration rights agreement. The Company is not obligated to effect any registration more than one time in anysix-month period and these registration rights terminate on August 7, 2017.

2017 PROXY STATEMENT		19

RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT

REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM(PROPOSAL 2)

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors has selected Grant Thornton LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of the Company for the year ending December 31, 2014.2017. Grant Thornton LLP has audited the Company’s and its predecessors’ financial statements since 2004. The audit of the Company’s annual consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 20132016, was completed by Grant Thornton LLP on February 20, 2014.22, 2017.

The Board of Directors is submitting the selection of Grant Thornton LLP for ratification at the Annual Meeting. The submission of this matter for ratification by stockholders is not legally required, but the Board of Directors and the Audit Committee believe the submission provides an opportunity for stockholders through their vote to communicate with the Board of Directors and the Audit Committee about an important aspect of corporate governance. If the stockholders do not ratify the selection of Grant Thornton LLP, the Audit Committee will reconsider, but will not be required to rescind, the selection of that firm as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm.firm for the year ending December 31, 2017. Representatives of Grant Thornton LLP are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting and will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so. Such representatives are also expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions.

The Audit Committee has the authority and responsibility to retain, evaluate and replace the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. The stockholders’ ratification of the appointment of Grant Thornton LLP does not limit the authority of the Audit Committee to change the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm at any time.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTEFOR THE RATIFICATION OF THE SELECTION OF GRANT THORNTONThe table below sets forth the aggregate fees and expenses billed by Grant Thornton LLP AS THE INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM OF THE COMPANY FOR THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBERfor the last two fiscal years:

		2016					2015
Audit    Audit fees were for professional services rendered for the audits of the Company’s annual consolidated financial statements included in its Annual Report on Form10-K, review of the Company’s quarterly financial statements included in its Quarterly Reports on Form10-Q and review of the Company’s other filings with the SEC, including comfort letters, consents and other research work necessary to comply with generally accepted auditing standards for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.		$1,552,155					$1,265,590
Tax    Tax fees are incurred in connection with tax return preparation and consultation on tax matters. There were no tax fees for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.		—					—
TOTAL		$1,552,155					$1,265,590

The charter of the Audit Committee and itspre-approval policy require that the Audit Committee review andpre-approve the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm’s fees for audit, audit-related, tax and other services. The Chairman of the Audit Committee has the authority to grantpre-approvals, provided such approvals are within thepre-approval policy and are presented to the Audit Committee at a subsequent meeting. For the year ended December 31, 2014.2016, the Audit Committee approved 100% of the services described above.

		Our Board unanimously recommends that stockholders vote “FOR” the ratification of the selection of Grant Thornton LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of the Company for the year ending December 31, 2017.

2017 PROXY STATEMENT		20

---

AUDIT MATTERSAudit Committee Report

The following report of the Audit Committee of the Company shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the SEC, nor shall this report be incorporated by reference into any filing made by the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.1934, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates such information by reference in such filing.

Audit Committee Report

Pursuant toAs described more fully in its charter, the Audit Committee’s principal functions include the duty to (i) annually reviewreviewing and reassessreassessing its performance and the adequacy of its charter;(ii) pre-approvepre-approving audit ornon-audit services proposed to be rendered by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm; (iii) annually reviewreviewing the qualifications and independence of the independent registered public accounting firm’s senior personnel who are providing services to the Company; (iv) reviewreviewing with management and the independent registered public accounting firm the Company’s annual and quarterly financial statements, earnings press releases and financial information and earnings guidance provided to analysts and ratings agencies;guidance; (v) reviewreviewing with management the Company’s majorsignificant financial risk exposures and the actions management has taken to monitor and control such exposures; (vi) reviewreviewing significant changes to the Company’s significant auditing and accounting principles and practices; (vii) reviewreviewing the independent registered public accounting firm’s internal quality-control procedures and the procedures for the Company’s financial reporting processes; and (viii) assistassisting the Board of Directors in monitoring compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. While the Audit Committee has the responsibilities and powers set forth in its charter, and the Company’s management and the independent registered public accounting firm are accountable to the Audit Committee, it is not the duty of the Audit Committee to plan or conduct audits or to determine that the Company’s financial statements and disclosures are complete and accurate and are in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and applicable laws, rules and regulations.

In performing its oversight role, the Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the Company’s audited financial statements with the Company’s management and independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee has also discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the matters required to be discussed by Auditing Standard No. 16 Communications“Communications with Audit Committees,Committees”, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”). The Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the written statement from the independent registered public accounting firm required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence and has discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm its independence. The Audit Committee also considers, in years where there has also consideredbeen a provision ofnon-audit services, whether the provision ofnon-audit services by the independent registered public accounting firm to the Company is compatible with maintaining the independent registered public accounting firm’s independence and has discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm its independence.

Based on the reviews and discussions described in this Audit Committee Report, and subject to the limitations on the roles and responsibilities of the Audit Committee referred to herein and in its charter, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Company’s audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 20132016, be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013,2016, which was filed with the SEC on February 20, 2014.22, 2017. The Audit Committee also selected Grant Thornton LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2014.2017.

Members of the Audit Committee rely, without independent verification, on the information provided to them and on the representations made by the Company’s management and independent registered public accounting firm. Accordingly, the Audit Committee’s oversight does not provide an independent basis to determine that management has maintained appropriate accounting and financial reporting principles or appropriate internal controls and procedures designed to assure compliance with accounting standards and applicable laws and regulations. Furthermore, the Audit Committee’s considerations and discussions referred to above do not assure that (i) the audit of the Company’s financial statements has been carried out in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, (ii) the Company’s financial statements are presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, or (iii) Grant Thornton LLP is in fact independent.

Members of theThe Audit Committee:

Ray M. Poage (Chairman)

William H. Easter III

Mark B. Puckett

John P. Surma

Audit and Other FeesCommittee

The table below sets forth the aggregate fees and expenses billed by Grant Thornton LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, for the last two fiscal years:

		For the Years Ended December 31,
		2013				2012
Audit Fees(1):
Audit		$	736,945			$	698,445
Quarterly Reviews			193,565				165,537
Other Filings			89,995				118,016
Subtotal			1,020,505				981,998
Tax Fees(2)			95,041				91,149
Total		$	1,115,546			$	1,073,147

 

(1)
Ray M. Poage (Chairman) Steven L. Beal William H. Easter III		Includes audit of the Company’s annual consolidated financial statements included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K, review of the Company’s quarterly financial statements included in its Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and review of the Company’s other filings with the SEC, including comfort letters, consents and other research work necessary to comply with generally accepted auditing standards for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.Mark B. Puckett John P. Surma

 

(2)   2017 PROXY STATEMENT	Tax return preparation and consultation on tax matters.	21

The charter of the Audit Committee and its pre-approval policy require that the Audit Committee review and pre-approve the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm’s fees for audit, audit-related, tax and other services. The Chairman of the Audit Committee has the authority to grant pre-approvals, provided such approvals are within the pre-approval policy and are presented to the Audit Committee at a subsequent meeting. For the year ended December 31, 2013, the Audit Committee approved 100% of the services described above under the captions “Audit Fees” and “Tax Fees.”

---

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

The table below provides certain information about the Company’s equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2013:2016. Performance units are included at the maximum potential payout percentage, except for the performance units in column (a) relating to the performance period that ended on December 31, 2016, which are included at the actual payout percentage of 182.5%:

 

		(a)				(b)				(c)
		Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights				Weighted-Exercise Price of Outstanding Options				Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in Column (a))
Equity compensation plan approved by security holders(1)			255,537	(2)		$	21.50				1,468,760
Equity compensation plan not approved by security holders(3)			—				—				—
Total			255,537								1,468,760

(a)

(b)

(c)

Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights

Weighted-Exercise Price of Outstanding Options

Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance  Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in Column (a))

Equity compensation plan approved by security holders(1)

1,263,341(2)

$15.33(3)

2,383,534

Equity compensation plan not approved by security holders(4)

–

–

–

TOTAL

1,263,341

2,383,534

 

(1)

(1)

In June 2012,2015, the stockholders of the Company approved the Amended and Restated 20062015 Stock Incentive Plan, the Company’s only equity compensation plan, which provides for the issuance of up to 7.510.5 million shares of the Company’s common stock. There are no outstanding warrants or equity rights awarded under the Company’s equity compensation plan. See Note F6 to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 20132016, for more information.

 

(2)

(2)

These securities do not include shares of restricted stock awarded under the Amended and Restated 20062015 Stock Incentive Plan.

 

(3)

None.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

The table below summarizes compensation paid by the Company to its non-employee directors during 2013:

Name(1)		Fees Earned or Paid in Cash(2)				Stock Awards (3)(4)				All other Compensation				Total
Steven L. Beal		$	66,500			$	175,059			$	864,638	(5)		$	1,106,197	(5)
Tucker S. Bridwell			68,000				175,059				—				243,059
William H. Easter, III			84,500				175,059				—				259,559
W. Howard Keenan, Jr.(6)			55,500				—				—				55,500
Gary A. Merriman			95,375				175,059				—				270,434
Ray M. Poage			100,000				175,059				—				275,059
Mark B. Puckett			121,500				175,059				—				296,559
A. Wellford Tabor			90,875				175,059				—				265,934

(1)(3)

Mr. Leach isPerformance unit awards do not included because he ishave an executive officer ofexercise price and, therefore, have been excluded from the Company and receives no additional compensation for serving on the Board of Directors; please see the Summary Compensation Table below for further details on the compensation that Mr. Leach received for his services to the Company during the 2013 year. Mr. Surma is not included because he was not a director of the Companyweighted-exercise price calculation in 2013. column (b).

 

(2)

The amounts in this column represent the fees earned by the directors during 2013. Fees earned during the fourth quarter of each year are paid during the first quarter of the next year. During the fourth quarter of 2012, Messrs. Beal, Bridwell, Easter, Keenan, Merriman, Poage, Puckett and Tabor earned $17,000, $15,500, $20,000, $20,000, $23,375, $22,000, $30,125 and $22,500, respectively, which amounts were paid during the first quarter of 2013 and not included in the table above. (4)

None.

(3)

The amounts in this column represent the grant date fair value computed in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 718 for awards granted in 2013. The Company values its restricted stock awards based on the average of the high and low market-quoted sales price of the Company’s common stock on the grant date of the award. Additional detail regarding the Company’s share-based awards is included in Note F to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.

(4)	Aggregate director stock awards for which restrictions had not lapsed as of December 31, 2013, totaled 1,800 shares each for Messrs. Beal, Bridwell, Easter, Merriman, Poage, Puckett and Tabor. Restrictions on these shares lapsed February 19, 2014.

(5)	Includes payment of $140,000 of consulting fees and $4,638 related to health care reimbursements pursuant to the Company’s consulting agreement with Mr. Beal. Also includes payment of $720,000 pursuant to the termination of the Company’s consulting agreement with Mr. Beal on August 14, 2013.

(6)	Mr. Keenan resigned from the Board of Directors in November 2013, thereby forfeiting his unvested restricted shares.

General.    The Board of Directors believes that providing a compensation package at the market median is necessary to attract and retain qualified directors. The Board of Directors believes that the compensation package should require a significant portion of the total compensation package to be equity-based to align the interests of the Company’s directors and stockholders. Mr. Leach, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and President, receives no additional compensation for his service on the Board of Directors.

Director Compensation.    The elements of compensation for the Company’s non-employee directors during the year ended December 31, 2013 were:

an annual retainer fee of $50,000;

annual retainer fees of $20,000, $13,500, $10,000, $13,500 and $15,000, respectively, to the chairmen of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Nominating & Governance Committee and Reserves Committee and the Lead Director;

attendance fees of $1,500 for Board of Directors’ and committee meetings; and

annual equity awards of shares of restricted stock to each director having a value of approximately $175,000.

Time of service related forfeiture restrictions on the Company’s restricted stock issued to directors lapse twelve months following the grant date of the award. All retainer and attendance fees are paid quarterly in cash to directors.

Additionally, each director is reimbursed for (i) travel and miscellaneous expenses to attend meetings and activities of the Board of Directors or its committees; (ii) travel and miscellaneous expenses related to such director’s participation in the Company’s general education and orientation program for directors; and (iii) travel and miscellaneous expenses for each director’s spouse who accompanies a director to attend meetings and activities of the Board of Directors or its committees.

After a review of the Company’s director compensation program and effective starting the fourth quarter of 2013, the Company increased the annual retainer fee for (i) the Chairman of the Compensation Committee from $13,500 to $15,000, (ii) the Chairman of the Nominating & Governance Committee from $10,000 to $13,500, and (iii) the Lead Director from $15,000 to $25,000.

Director Stock Ownership Guidelines.    The Compensation Committee established director stock ownership guidelines under which directors who are not also executive officers of the Company are expected to own shares of the Company’s common stock having a market value of at least $400,000. Directors are expected to meet these guidelines within three years of becoming a director. The Company’s director stock ownership guidelines are designed to increase a director’s equity stake in the Company and to align the director’s interests more closely with those of the Company’s stockholders. As of December 31, 2013, all directors were in compliance with the stock ownership guidelines.

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Executive Summary

The Company compensates its executive management using a mix of base salary, annual performance bonus and equity grants, with the objectives of attracting and retaining key executive officers critical to long-term success, compensating those executive officers fairly and competitively for their responsibilities and accomplishments, aligning management’s incentives with the long-term interests of the Company’s stockholders, and planning for an orderly succession plan for executive positions. The Company believes that base salary levels should generally be set near the middle of the Company’s competitive marketplace for comparable positions, and that the Company’s variable compensation programs (i.e., the annual performance bonus program and long-term incentives) should result in total compensation that is directly related to Company performance.

For executive management, a significant portion of total compensation is delivered using a combination of restricted stock and performance units to ensure a focus on behaviors that improve total stockholder return over the long-term. The allocation of total targeted direct compensation for the Company’s executive officers among

the different components thereof is set forth in the following table, which is based on annualized base salaries as of January 1, 2013, 2013 target bonus levels and restricted stock and performance units that were granted effective in January 2013 (assuming vesting at target levels with the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, disregarding any estimates for forfeiture):

Name		Base Salary				Bonus				Equity
Timothy A. Leach			10	%			10	%			81	%
E. Joseph Wright			11	%			11	%			78	%
C. William Giraud			14	%			10	%			76	%
Darin G. Holderness			15	%			11	%			74	%
Matthew. G. Hyde			15	%			11	%			74	%

As in previous years, the Compensation Committee, with the assistance of the Company’s independent compensation consultant, reviewed the compensation practices of peers within the industry and took actions in 2013 to align the Company’s compensation levels with those of the industry. The Compensation Committee also considered the results of the advisory “say-on-pay” vote at the most recent annual stockholders meeting, in which the compensation of the named executive officers was approved by a significant majority. The Company’s key executive compensation decisions in 2013 included:

maintaining Mr. Leach’s base salary at its 2012 level;

awarding a mix of performance units and restricted stock instead of solely restricted stock; and

aligning internal pay parity and consistency while considering peer compensation metrics for individual roles and executive officers generally.

Introduction and Overview

General.    This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (i) explains the Company’s compensation philosophy, objectives, policies and practices with respect to its executive officers, and (ii) analyzes the elements of compensation for each of the individuals identified below, whom the Company refers to in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis as the Company’s “named executive officers.”

 

Name   2017 PROXY STATEMENT		Principal Position
Timothy A. Leach		Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President
E. Joseph Wright		Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
C. William Giraud		Executive Vice President, Chief Commercial Officer and Corporate Secretary
Darin G. Holderness		Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Matthew G. Hyde		Senior Vice President of Exploration22

---

ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE THE COMPENSATION OF THE COMPANY’S NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS(PROPOSAL 3)

Executive compensation is an important matter to the Company, the Board of Directors, the Compensation PhilosophyCommittee and Objectives.the Company’s stockholders. As required pursuant to Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company is asking its stockholders to vote, on anon-binding advisory basis, on a resolution approving the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers as disclosed under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and the compensation tables and narrative discussion under “Compensation of Named Executive Officers” contained in this proxy statement.

The Compensation Committee continuously reviews, evaluates and updates the Company’s executive compensation programs to ensure that the Company provides rewards for individual performance, team achievements and corporate results and encourages an ownership mentality among the Company’s executives and other key employees. The success of the Company and its ability to maximize stockholder value is dependent on its ability to attract, retain and motivate the best available talent in the energy industry. As such, the Compensation Committee views the Company’s most important asset, its people, as an investment rather than an expense. Consequently, the Compensation Committee has developed overarching objectives for its executive compensation program, which are as follows:

To accomplish these objectives, the Company provides what it believes is a competitive total compensation package to the Company’s executive officers through a combination of base salary, performance-based annual cash incentive awards, long-term equity incentive compensation and broad-based benefit programs.

The Board of Directors requests the support of the Company’s stockholders for the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement. This advisory vote to approve the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers gives its stockholders the opportunity to make their opinions known about the Company’s executive compensation programs. As the Company seeks to align the Company’s executive compensation programs with the interests of its stockholders while continuing to retain key talented executives that drive the Company’s success, it asks that its stockholders approve the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement. Accordingly, for the reasons discussed above, the Board of Directors recommends that stockholders vote in favor of the following resolution:

“RESOLVED, that the stockholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation philosophy and policies and the compensation of the named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 ofRegulation S-K, including under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and the compensation tables and narrative discussion under “Compensation of Named Executive Officers” contained in the proxy statement.”

This vote on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers is only advisory and not binding on the Company, the Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee. Although the outcome of this advisory vote on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers isnon-binding, the Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors will review and consider the outcome of this vote when making future compensation decisions for the Company’s named executive officers.

		Our Board recommends that stockholders vote “FOR” the approval on an advisory basis of the compensation of the Company’s Named Executive Officers as disclosed under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and the accompanying compensation tables and narrative discussion under “Compensation of Named Executive Officers” contained in this Proxy Statement.

2017 PROXY STATEMENT		23

ADVISORY VOTE ON THE FREQUENCY OF THE ADVISORY VOTE ON THE COMPENSATION OF THE COMPANY’S NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS(PROPOSAL 4)

The Company is seeking a vote, on anon-binding advisory basis, regarding the frequency of the advisory vote on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers as disclosed pursuant to the executive compensation disclosure rules of the SEC. Stockholders may vote to approve holding an advisory vote on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers every one, two or three years.

The Board of Directors recommends that the advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation occur every year (annually). The Board previously determined to hold an advisory vote on the compensation of the named executive officers every year until the next required advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes. The Company believes this frequency is appropriate because the Company values stockholder input on executive compensation and believes that an annual advisory vote will provide the Company with regular input on important issues relating to executive compensation.

When voting on this advisory vote on the frequency of the advisory vote on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers, stockholders should understand that they are not voting “for” or “against” the recommendation of the Board of Directors to hold the advisory vote every year. Rather, stockholders will have the option to choose whether to approve holding future advisory votes on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers every one, two or three years, or to abstain entirely from voting on the matter. The option that receives the most votes from stockholders will be considered by the Board of Directors as the stockholder’s recommendation as to the frequency of future stockholder advisory votes on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers. However, the outcome of this vote on the frequency of future stockholder advisory votes on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers is advisory and will not be binding on the Company or the Board of Directors. Accordingly, the Board of Directors may choose to hold the advisory vote on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers on a more or less frequent basis than the option recommended by stockholders. Nevertheless, the Board of Directors will review and consider the outcome of this vote when making its determination as to the frequency of future advisory stockholder votes on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers.

		Our Board recommends that stockholders vote for “ONE YEAR” as the frequency of holding the advisory vote on the compensation of the Company’s Named Executive Officers.

2017 PROXY STATEMENT		24

NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following provides summary information regarding the experiences of the Company’s Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and three most highly compensated current executive officers other than the two foregoing officers. The named executive officer profiles exclude Darin Holderness, who served as Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer until his resignation from such positions on May 17, 2016, but remained as an adviser to the Company until January 5, 2017. Due to his role as the Chief Financial Officer during the 2016 year, he is required to be identified as a named executive officer for the 2016 year in the compensation disclosures that follow these biographies.

		Timothy A. Leach, age 57, has been the Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of the Company since its formation in February 2006 and the President of the Company since July 2009. Prior to the formation of the Company, Mr. Leach was the Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of two private companies, and employed by Parker & Parsley Petroleum Company (now Pioneer Natural Resources) in a variety of capacities, including serving as Executive Vice President and as a member of its Executive Committee. He is a graduate of Texas A&M University with a Bachelor of Science degree in Petroleum Engineering.
		E. Joseph Wright, age 57,has been the Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company since November 2013. Mr. Wright was the Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer from November 2010 to November 2013. Mr. Wright was the Vice President — Engineering and Operations since the Company’s formation in February 2006 to October 2010. Prior to the formation of the Company, Mr. Wright served in various senior officer positions for two private companies, including as the Vice President – Operations & Engineering, and was employed by Mewbourne Oil Company in several operations, engineering and capital markets positions. He is a graduate of Texas A&M University with a Bachelor of Science degree in Petroleum Engineering.
		Jack F. Harper, age 45,has been the Executive Vice President of the Company since March 2014 and the Chief Financial Officer of the Company since May 2016. From May 2016 to August 2016, Mr. Harper was also the Treasurer of the Company. From January 2013 until March 2014, Mr. Harper was involved in private investments at Hedloc Investment GP, LLC, the general partner of Hedloc Investment Company, LP. From 2006 to 2013, Mr. Harper served in a variety of capacities at the Company, including serving as the Company’s Senior Vice President and Chief of Staff, Vice President — Business Development and Capital Markets and Director of Investor Relations and Business Development of the Company. Prior to joining the Company in 2006, Mr. Harper was employed by Unocal Corporation as Manager of Planning and Evaluation and Manager of Business Development, by Pure Resources, Inc. in various capacities, including in his last position as Vice President, Finance and Investor Relation, and by Tom Brown, where his last position was Vice President, Investor Relations, Corporate Development and Treasurer. He is a graduate of Baylor University with a Bachelor of Business Administration degree in Finance.
		C. William Giraud, age 37,has been the Executive Vice President, Chief Commercial Officer and Corporate Secretary of the Company since November 2013. Mr. Giraud was the Senior Vice President, Chief Commercial Officer and Corporate Secretary of the Company from May 2013 to November 2013. Mr. Giraud was the Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of the Company from October 2010 to May 2013. Mr. Giraud was the Vice President — General Counsel and Secretary of the Company from November 2009 to October 2010. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Giraud practiced corporate and securities law at Vinson & Elkins, L.L.P. He is a graduate of Wake Forest University with a Bachelor of Arts degree in Economics and a graduate of the University of Texas School of Law with a Doctor of Jurisprudence degree.

2017 PROXY STATEMENT		25

		J. Steve Guthrie, age 55,has been the Senior Vice President of Business Operations and Engineering of the Company since November 2013. Mr. Guthrie previously served as the Vice President of Texas of the Company from October 2010 to November 2013. Mr. Guthrie also served as Texas Asset Manager of the Company from July 2008 to October 2010 and as Corporate Engineering Manager from August 2004 to July 2008. Prior to joining the Company in 2004, Mr. Guthrie was employed by Moriah Resources as Business Development Manager, by Henry Petroleum in various engineering and operations capacities and by Exxon in several engineering and operations positions. Mr. Guthrie is a graduate of Texas Tech University with a Bachelor of Science degree in Petroleum Engineering.

2017 PROXY STATEMENT		26

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Table of Contents

Executive Summary

The Company’s executive compensation program is designed to reward the leadership team for delivering results against its long-term objectives, which is how the Company creates value for its stockholders. The program’s design aligns the interests of the Company’s executive team and stockholders by linking pay to various performance metrics over the short and long-term. Awards are made using a mix of fixed and variable components with different time horizons and payout forms (cash and stock) to reward annual and sustained performance over the long-term while discouraging imprudent risk taking. At the 2016 annual stockholders’ meeting, stockholders approved the Company’s named executive officer compensation program, with more than 99% of votes cast in favor. For 2017, the Company’s compensation program is continuing its evolution by becoming more formulaic and by the Company revising its peer group to maintain comparability tosimilarly-sized peers.

2016 Performance Highlights

The Compensation Committee has made performance-based compensation an increasingly important element of executive officer compensation in recent years. Accordingly, it is important to review and understand the Company’s performance when looking at the Company’s 2016 executive compensation.

Based on the strong results in 2016, Concho’s executive officers received a cash bonus of 171.5% of target. The company’s shareholder return for the 2014-2016 performance period resulted in outstanding performance shares being earned at December 31, 2016 at 182.5% of target

Performance highlights for 2016 include:

		•     Increased production 5% year-over-year, which compares to the Company’s initial production growth target for 2016 of a decrease of 5% year-over-year •     Continued focused on optimizing drilling and completion methods •     Continued to advance full-field development and increase operational efficiencies through pad drilling, batch completions, multi-zone targeting and long-lateral development
		•     Maintained safety performance levels for the Company’s employees and contractors that significantly outperformed the Company’s industry peers •     Opened onsite wellness and childcare facilities
		•     Demonstrated capital discipline by executing a drilling program within cash flows from operations as well as within the Company’s guidance range •     Significantly reduced annual cash cost structure •     Reduced long-term debt by more than $600 million and successfully refinanced senior notes

2017 PROXY STATEMENT		27

		•     Consolidated approximately 68,000 net acres in key operating areas, increasing the Company’s long-lateral development opportunities and enhancing the Company’s exposure to premier resources with significant development upside •     Prudently financed acquisitions with a combination ofnon-core asset sales, equity issuances and cash on hand, thereby preserving the Company’s financial strength while building scale in key growth areas

Executive Compensation Program

The key features of the Company’s executive compensation program for the following executive officers (“named executive officers” or “NEOs”) are outlined in this section:

Elements of the Company’s 2016 Total Compensation

The Company compensates its executive management using a mix of base salary, annual performance bonus and equity grants, with the following objectives:

2017 PROXY STATEMENT		28

The Company’s executive officer compensation program for 2016 was comprised of the following four components: base salaries, performance-based annual cash incentive awards, long-term equity incentive grants (time-based and performance-based) and a broad-based benefits program. The Compensation Committee determined the appropriate level for each compensation component during 2016 based on the Company’s recruiting and retention goals, its view of internal pay parity and consistency, peer group data and overall Company performance.

As in previous years, the Compensation Committee, with the assistance of the Company’s independent compensation consultant, reviewed the compensation practices of peers within the industry and took actions in 2016 to align the Company’s compensation levels with the Company’s long-term objectives and with those of the industry. The Compensation Committee also considered the results of the advisory“say-on-pay” vote at the most recent annual stockholders meeting, in which the compensation of the named executive officers was approved by approximately 99% of stockholders voting. The Company’s key executive compensation decisions for 2016 are summarized below.

2017 PROXY STATEMENT		29

Compensation Best Practices

The Compensation Committee believes that the Company’s executive compensation program follows best practices aligned with long-term stockholder interests. Below are highlights of the Company’s compensation practices: